
Literature Review Papers
Outline for Literature Reviews
You will need Adobe Acrobat in order to read or print these manuscripts
January 14 Literature Review on Chromatin Remodeling
Cairns, B. R., Lorch, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, M., Lacomis, L., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Du, J., Laurent, B. and Kornberg, R. D. (1996). RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell, 87(7), 1249-60.Section A: Seth Stratton
Section B:Michael Buckley
Section A; Joe Dan Dunn
Section B: Jake Lai
January 28 Literature Review on Repair
C. Masutani et al. (1999) The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase eta. Nature 399: 700.Section A: Prasanthi Bhagavatula
Section B: Carrie Arnold
K. Leuther et al. (1999) Structure of DNA-dependent protein kinase: implications for its regulation by DNA. EMBO J. 18: 1114.
Section A: Joe Budman
Section B: Mike Ginsberg
February 4 Literature Review on Transcription & Regulation
Callaci S, Heyduk E, Heyduk T. (1999) Core RNA polymerase from E. coli induces a major change in the domain arrangement of the sigma 70 subunit. Mol Cell 3(2):229-38.Section A & B: Kaman Chan
Section A & B: Christopher Sundberg
February 11 Literature Review on Eukaryotic Transcription factors
Myers, L.C., Gustafsson, C.M., Hayashibara, K.C., Brown, P.O., and Kornberg, R.D. (1999) Mediator protein mutations that selectively abolish activated transcription PNAS 96:67-72Section A: Sunny Chin
Section B: Mike Cleary
Section A: Vivian Thruong
Section B: Tom Purcell
February 18 Literature review on RNA structure, catalysis, and processing
Ferré-DAmaré, A. R., Zhou, K. and Doudna, J.A.,(1998) Crystal Structure of a hepatitis delta virus ribozyme. Nature 395, 567-574.Section A: Jungie Liu
Section B: Katrin Karbstein
Herschlag, D. (1998) Ribozyme crevices and catalysis. Nature 395, 548-549.
Section A: Rebecca Vega
Section B: Frauke Rees
March 3 Literature Review on Gene Expression
Wang, D. G., et al. (1998) Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. Science 280, 1077-82 .Section A: Kathryn Hunkapiller
Section B: Evan Hurowitz
Section A: Jomaquai Jenkins
Section B: Caroline Uhlik
The following questions should be considered in writing your two-page report on each of the papers presented in the literature reviews. Everyone will be required to turn in their reports at the time of the literature review except those presenting papers. Reviews must be brought to the review session. One set of reviews can be up to week late with no academic penalty. However, if a subsequent set of reviews are turned in late without a written medical excuse, the score for those reviews will be penalized one point per week late. Papers turned in more than 5 weeks late will receive no credit.
Introduction and Background:
What hypotheses are being tested in this paper?What information induced the authors to perform the experiments?
What new methods or insights brought to bear on the problem?
Methods:
What are the critical methods of the paper?What enabling technologies are used?
What are the weaknesses of the methods used?
Are there other or better approaches that could be used?
If this is a genetics approach, what would be a biochemical or molecular approach?
If this is a biochemical or molecular approach, what genetics methods could be used?
Results and Discussion
What are the primary conclusions of the paper?Did the authors prove their hypotheses?
What novel information or directions come from this work?
What control experiments were performed?
What assumptions still remain in the work?
How could these assumptions be tested?
What other explanations for the observations are still possible?